Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 6821 - 6840 of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:54 pm
R.P.B., offering in so doing a detailed explanation of the application, and in this case the lack of application, of Florida Statute 61.13001 to a case where a parent in another state is not relocating, but seeking to move the child to their primary, out of state residence. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
” And despite Snap’s policy against child exploitation and the distribution of CSAM, the platform’s existing “CSAM detection technology like PhotoDNA and CSAI Match is . . . a poor fit to prevent sexual grooming on Snapchat. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
A New York family law court joined the majority of courts in other states that exclude higher education loans and grants as income for child support purposes. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:34 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Holtom, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 934 (20 April 2010) Valentas & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 200 (03 February 2010) Clarke, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 684 (11 February 2010) R, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 194 (02 February 2010) R, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 907 (14 April 2010) Attorney Generals Reference No. 112 of 2009 (Church) [2010] EWCA Crim 351 (10 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:54 am
" So begins the majority opinion in today's 5-4 ruling of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Soter v. [read post]