Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 6821 - 6840 of 7,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm by sydniemery
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
On the other side of the fence, many US states have adopted anti-ESG legislation[vi] that promotes financial returns over environmental concerns. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
Box 110351 Birmingham, AL 35211 Phone: (205) 853-5703 (V/TTY) Fax: (205) 856-6226 Technet 275 Crockett Circle Florence, AL 35633 Phone: (256) 765-3895 DISABILITY ORGANIZATIONS AIDS Birmingham Aids Outreach, Inc P.O. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed in an August 28, 2024 Law360 article (here), the bill, which still must be approved by the California Senate and signed into law by the California governor, AI systems to adhere to standards ensuring the public’s safety, including engaging in pre-deployment safety testing and post-deployment monitoring, and putting safeguards in place to prevent the misuse of potentially dangerous capabilities. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
He repeatedly uses terms like enlisting the state to “stamp out any subculture and make its members outcasts. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Meyer actively encouraging the state governors to take back the National Guard and fight off Dwight D. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]