Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 6821 - 6840 of 8,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
Commercial loss in France can include loss resulting from sales of infringing goods, loss based on the volume of sales by infringer or profits which the IP holder would have realized had they themselves made the sale. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The staff stated then that these are treated as vesting on the regular vesting schedule (unless the holder has actually retired). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:25 am by Erin Miller
  One hopes that, 55 years after Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
  The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times expresses disappointment with the Court’s “inconsistent” rulings in First Amendment cases, arguing that in Holder v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]