Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 28,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 8:04 am
A licensed practical nurse whose employment with a senior living facility was terminated one day after returning to work with restrictions after having undergone knee surgery may not proceed with her claims under the ADA, the FMLA, and state law, a federal district court in Minnesota ruled. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
In this respect, the federalism principles at issue here are strikingly similar to those that arose in the Affordable Care Act case of King v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
Yesterday, in the case of Lindo v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:22 am
The recent Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals case French v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:53 pm
Rigby v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:47 am
State and State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 1:05 pm
Thus, if an employee lives in Florida but works remotely in another state, Florida law will not automatically apply. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:06 pm
Furthermore, the fire investigator who testified on behalf of defendant stated that his inspection of the unit where plaintiff lived contained items and furnishings indicative of a person living there. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 6:58 pm
City of Barbourville, 389 F.3d 568 (6th Cir. 2004)(no probable cause because affidavit did not connect residence to illegal activity or even state that person engaged in such activity lived there); State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
"What if you have not lived long enough in either the State or County? [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 10:07 am
Additional Resources: Nissan Motor Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
Tune is not a paedophile and that it is in the interests of his daughter to live with him. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:59 am
” At The Originalism Blog, Chris Green discusses whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group has standing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Conrad v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 6:39 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:37 am
This week’s Sixth Circuit ruling in Tucker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
As a citizen, the dissent may have the higher ground: “In determining that the unfettered use of GPS devices ‘to pry into the details of people’s daily lives is not consistent with the values at the core of our State Constitution’s prohibition against unreasonable searches’ (People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Salazar v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
DJCIS, and again in its recent decision, Doe v. [read post]
