Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 29,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2016, 8:10 am
Acorda Therapeutics v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:14 pm
The Canadian Securities Transition Office has stated that it will release a technical commentary on the proposed legislation in the coming weeks and will also deliver a transition plan to the Minister and participating jurisdictions by July 12, 2010. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law that requires licensed centers to post notices to inform patients about the availability of state-funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion, and requires unlicensed centers to disclose that they do not provide medical services. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:35 am
As the syllabus of Justice Alito’s majority opinion suggests, this Supreme Court has held that earlier decisions in Rowe and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:59 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am
Knoetze v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
VOLUNTARY ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
[The State] seized several computers, external drives, and other computer-related devices from Starner's home. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:25 am
The case is State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
Citing Anderson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:37 am
Vasallo v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
State Senator Phil Berger has announced plans to file a bill to allow officials with religious objections to opt out of performing such marriages. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:54 am
One such case out of Iowa, State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:44 am
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:09 pm
Amster v Baker, 2017 WL 2226684 (MD App. 5/22/2017)Filed under: Access to Government, Records, Uncategorized [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:51 pm
The secretary and the state ask the court to review that decision in Azar v. [read post]
