Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 6821 - 6840
of 71,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 7:43 am
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and concluded that plaintiff's patents did not satisfy the transformation prong of the machine-or-transformation test under In re Bilski, 130 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
Fix, William R. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Representing Arizona will be the state Solicitor General, Mary R. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 6:25 am
Supreme Court in Waller v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
See Kijowska v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
R. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:04 am
Writing for the majority, Judge Richard R. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
They further stated that the "arbitrator shall be entitled to award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:12 am
Hobbs v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
R. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:56 am
That’s why I was interested to see the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Hopkins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
Pacific Shores Property Owners Association v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 3:58 am
R. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Greg Abbott, Attorney General for the State of Texas, No. 11? [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Within those regulations, they state that these regulations are intended to reflect Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
Ms H appealed to the Court of Appeal.Ms H argued that in reaching its decision on whether she could pay the rent, Hounslow had failed to have regard to its duty under s.11 Children Act.The Court of Appeal found:Following ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, a decision that affected the upbringing of a child had to be made with the well being of the child as a primary concern. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
Ms H appealed to the Court of Appeal.Ms H argued that in reaching its decision on whether she could pay the rent, Hounslow had failed to have regard to its duty under s.11 Children Act.The Court of Appeal found:Following ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, a decision that affected the upbringing of a child had to be made with the well being of the child as a primary concern. [read post]
