Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 6821 - 6840 of 11,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 4:15 am by David J. DePaolo
Removes Schedule V drugs from those for which doctors must check the database. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 2:20 pm by Alex Vitrak
Since its reauthorization in 1982, Section 5 objections prevented 46 discriminatory voting laws in Alabama from going into effect, seven from the state and 39 from local jurisdictions. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The officials filed a petition Monday in the case of Cline v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
v=M3JtBUgiji4Third-year Washington University School of Law student Joe Franklin discusses his interests in IP law and his experiences in the D.C. clinical education program. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (A copy of the panel’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
  But the text of the statute facially applies whenever the defendant is seven years older than the victim. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
Furthermore, Article 5 of the 1982 Constitution imposes strict duty for state organs to adhere to constitutional principles:No law or administrative or local rules and regulations shall contravene the [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Giovanetti, a resident of New Jersey, spent twenty-seven of his workin [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Section 5 requires nine states and assorted jurisdictions in seven others to secure Justice Department approval before changing their voting laws. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Section 5 requires nine states and assorted jurisdictions in seven others to secure Justice Department approval before changing their voting laws. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
(For an example of an appointment on the question of jurisdiction, see not only the Windsor case but also Hohn v. [read post]