Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 55,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:28 pm
Washington and Hammon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
He says that means that you're "gambling" under Washington law because the chips are "things of value" -- i.e., have value because they let you keep playing the game.Importantly, the panel holds that this is gambling not because some people sell these chips on a secondary market (e.g., the chips have "actual" cash value). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm
Once again, we would like to thank all our readers and the many people who have contributed to the success of the blog over this period and particularly the large number of people who have written for us over the past 5 years. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm
The court cited three precedent cases that addressed the warrant requirement for searches incident to a lawful arrest, Chimel v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:07 am
In Potts v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:20 am
The latest issue of the African Human Rights Law Journal (Vol. 19, no. 1, 2019). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:25 am
Derogation and the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights case of APDF and IHRDA v Mali Mikaela Heikkilä & Maija Mustaniemi-Laakso, Vulnerability as a human rights variable: African and European developments Hoolo ‘Nyane & Tekane Maqakachane, Standing to litigate in the public interest in Lesotho: The case for a liberal approach Mkhululi Nyathi & Matshobana Ncube, The 2017 military coup in Zimbabwe: Implications for human rights and the rule of… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:46 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:46 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
Reibl v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am
I discussed Daniels v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:29 pm
I previously posted about the case of Miken v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
In Perfect 10 v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The general practice that the court has adopted of anonymising the parties to financial remedy proceedings in its public judgments is not in accordance with the law: BT v CU at [113], A v M at [104]-[106], Xanthopoulos at [119]-[121] & [140], Gallagher at [5(vi)] & [81]. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm
Sessions, was one of those people. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Levine V. [read post]
