Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 6821 - 6840 of 9,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, the justices summarily ordered Arkansas to provide names of same-sex partners on birth certificates. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Preventing coal companies from using compliance schedules to loophole around th [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And do we care if the Court hears careful briefing and argument prior to a decision, or is it enough if a five-justice majority makes strikingly new law, as was the case in the famous Indian peyote case in Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
Trinity Universal of Kan., 939 P.2d 869, 872 (Kan. 1997); Smith v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Russ Bensing
That somebody could wind up being executed over something like this is something Franz Kafka couldn’t have dreamed of, and seven of the nine justices on the US Supreme Court agreed last week in Maples v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 2 November 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the libel case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2395 (QB). [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Which is entirely unconstitutional, says Erica Smith of the Institute for Justice, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:38 am by Glenn Gerstell
  On their side was a 1979 Supreme Court ruling (Smith v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 11:28 am
 And speaking of wins . . . . let’s talk about Hernandez v. [read post]