Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 44,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
Same-Sex Marriages As of right now, Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that pursuant to L’Anza the first sale doctrine set forth in Section 109(a) does not apply to foreign-made copies of a U.S. copyrighted work, unless those same copies have already been sold in the United States with the copyright owner’s consent. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:28 pm
Former US President Jimmy Carter Monday filed an amicus brief to state his disagreement with a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, calling the ruling “deeply mistaken” and “dangerous. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
But it could also be that Google files a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:13 am
In response to the law, the State Department changed its Foreign Affairs Manual to allow for such a designation, and put it the following note in a big box for emphasis: NOTE: The United States does not officially recognize Taiwan as a “state” or “country,” although passport issuing officers may enter “Taiwan” as a place of birth. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
It held in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
” As long as any statute is directed at private citizens and interstate commerce directly—and not to the states as states—it likely does not run afoul of the anti-commandeering doctrine. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
In the United States, there are two federal agencies that share primary responsibility for ensuring that vaccines are safe for the public. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:01 am
(c) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
Why does the own name defence matter? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
Oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States was held in Florence v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:18 am
Underlining why one does not litigate where one does not know the rules, here is an otherwise meritorious legal malpractice case which is now dismissed with prejudice for breaking the Washington state "two dismissal "rule. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:18 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in the case of Ontario v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
United States, 437 U.S. 1, 15 (1978) (“[R]eversal for trial error, as distinguished from evidentiary insufficiency, does not constitute a decision to the effect that the government has failed to prove its case[;] it implies nothing with respect to the guilt or innocence of the defendant. [read post]
