Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 6841 - 6860 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
State of Nevada Judicial Ethics & Election Practices Comm’n, 2000 WL 33937547, *4 (D. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by admin
Richard Booker, Bob Marley Movement of Jah People, Inc. and The Bob Marley Heritage Corporation, Case No. 1:11-cv-24326-MGC which is currently pending in the United States District Court in and for the Southern District of Florida in Miami. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Tonya Gisselberg
Amazon.com, Inc., No. 11-1990-JLR, United States District Court, Western District of Washington at Seattle. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm by Ken
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:59 am by Mark Zamora
Whirlpool Corporation, Sears Holdings Corp, and Sears Roebuck & Co, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
“It's hard to know how this is going to play out until we see more units permitted and different types of units and how the guidance gets applied or not applied by state authorities and EPA to an individual set of circumstances,” said Steve Kohl, a partner at Warner, Norcross & Judd LLP who represented the Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative for two permit applications in Michigan.However, reducing emissions through efficiency has been the main… [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
 After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]