Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 6841 - 6860 of 9,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
… in AM & S Europe v Commission, … 41. the Court stated that the protection [of legal privilege] was subject to two cumulative conditions. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm by Jason Mazzone
(Asked about Michigan voters who responded to the Court's decision in Grutter v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am by MacIsaac
 Specifically the High Court stated as follows: [82] The issue addressed in the passage from Gordon v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am by Susanna Villani (University of Bologna)
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am by John Bellinger
”)  The Second Circuit panel rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that courts are not required to defer to Executive branch SoIs and that there is, or should be, a jus cogens exception to official acts immunity, holding that it was bound by the Circuit’s prior decision in Matar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:57 pm by Ryan Radia
Could this provision cause courts to revisit the willfulness standard discussed in United States v. [read post]