Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 6841 - 6860 of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2018, 7:25 am by Guido Paola
The appellant's arguments may be summarised as follows:Article 123(2) EPCCompared with claim 1 as originally filed, claim 1 of the main request had been amended by the addition of five features identified as follows by the Opposition Division:i) a housing with an inner surface provided with threads;ii) such that energy is accumulated in the torsion spring upon rotation of the dose setting member;iii) and released to eject automatically;iv) [display member] threadely engaged with the threads of… [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am by Guido Paola
The appellant's arguments may be summarised as follows:Article 123(2) EPCCompared with claim 1 as originally filed, claim 1 of the main request had been amended by the addition of five features identified as follows by the Opposition Division:i) a housing with an inner surface provided with threads;ii) such that energy is accumulated in the torsion spring upon rotation of the dose setting member;iii) and released to eject automatically;iv) [display member] threadely engaged with the threads of… [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 4:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
., is more policy-oriented, and typically features remarks by political figures interspersed among the various topical panels. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
And I am still trying to figure out how to ask the FBI guys, judge, and AUSAs if any of them will talk to my. . . . [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:22 am by SHG
When the Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-08-24: Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Maybe his lawyer figured it was a low-probability thing and would also look bad in the brief. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-08-24: Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]