Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 68,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 2:15 am
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Secretary of State. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 2:48 am
The Supreme Court held that “financially independent” in s 117B(3) means “not financially dependent upon the state”. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:50 am
The State of New York allegedly had an unofficial policy against granting parole to violent offenders. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 11:44 am
Boyer v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:43 am
Here is the opinion in City of New York v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:00 pm
And here's a link to my post when the CCA granted discretionary review.PD-1569-08, Francis William Stringer v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The newly granted cases will be heard in the new Term starting in October The securities fraud case is Stoneridge Investment v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 1:20 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:16 pm
Ohio State Conference of the NAACP (2014): application to stay filed September 25, 2014; motion to stay granted September 29, 2014; Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan would denyNorth Carolina v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:00 am
Deaver v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:00 am
The New Jersey divorce judge was wrong in granting the ex-wife $36,774 in counsel and expert fees in this multi-state custody action. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-1059, 07-1078 Case name: United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:11 pm
If he indeed did that, I could see why you might want to fire the guy.The Court of Appeal holds that the letter at issue was protected by the common interest privilege, and hence that the defendant's anti-SLAPP motion should have been granted in its entirety. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:01 am
§ 1252(f)(1) precluded the lower courts from granting injunctive relief, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Reno v. [read post]
