Search for: "In the Interest of A.M."
Results 6841 - 6854
of 6,854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2006, 6:00 am
This should be an interesting teleconference. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 7:18 am
Conflict of Interest! [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 10:45 pm
Here’s the abstract/introduction: This paper, which will appear as a chapter in the forthcoming Handbook of Law and Economics (A.M. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
The Board noted that neither party called any of the five employees to testify concerning his or her whereabouts between 6 and 6:16 a.m. on September 22, 2005. [read post]
6 Jul 2006, 2:08 am
"UPDATE 8 (9:50 a.m.): Judge Kaye's dissent says that the equal protection claim should have been whether there is a legitimate state interest in excluding same-sex couples from marriage, not whether the statute benefits those who it was supposed to benefit.UPDATE 9 (9:55 a.m.): Dissent find that heightened scrutiny should have been applied because of sexual orientation discrimination, sex discrimination, and denial of a fundamental right, "a test that… [read post]
9 May 2006, 4:18 am
Chief Justice Jefferson wrote the majority opinion and Justice Johnson wrote the dissenting opinion.In In the Interest of A.M. and B.M, the Court examined "under what circumstances a parent, who has been ordered to pay periodic child support, may raise the affirmative defense of Texas Family Code section 157.008", a statute allowing a parent to off-set child support if the parent cared for the child longer than the court-ordered possession. [read post]
11 Nov 2005, 11:44 am
As a courtesy, Swedelson & Gottlieb/Association Lien Services will be hosting a teleconference on Thursday, November 17, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., to explain new civil code changes. [read post]
18 Oct 2005, 2:12 pm
Normally it's 12 or 1 a.m. [read post]
17 Oct 2005, 2:24 pm
"This is a regional cable news show but I wanted to share my talking points with the firm:The myth that bankruptcy somehow ended at 12:01 a.m. today is false. [read post]
3 Oct 2005, 2:50 am
She has not infringed on any of plaintiffs' alleged copyrighted interest..... 7. [read post]
15 Jun 2005, 7:00 pm
Or whether it merely reflects Kellenberger looking for rhetorical ways to defend his organization, without saying anything genuinely interesting about its views on neutrality. [read post]
7 Feb 2005, 10:39 pm
These are three speakers who should provide some very interesting insight in subject areas that are of great importance to all criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
10 Jan 2005, 5:45 am
Starting at 10 a.m. [read post]
2 Aug 2004, 2:52 pm
Spectators got the feeling that the panel was not too interested. [read post]
