Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 7,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2009, 11:48 am
" Opinion 286, New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics (March 16, 1973); see also, See ABA Formal Ops 310, 318; Ohio State Bar Assn, Op 83-1 (1983); Florida Bar Op. 86-1 (1986); Utah State Bar Op 138 (1994); Suffolk County Bar Ass'n Op 89-2. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:02 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
The plaintiffs, Stuart Sieger and David Spencer, each held 1/6 of the company's shares, with the remaining 2/3 held by defendant Louis Zak. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
"3. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:33 pm
” 3. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
” The suit alleges that the restraint and blunt force trauma was perpetrated by the two Renschler brothers, who are referred to in the suit as “John Doe 1” and “John Doe 2. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:03 am
Representative John Tanner (Tennessee) re-introduced legislation H.R. 2641 ( May 21, 2009) to amend section 1862 of the Social Security Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 6:58 am
To get it done, he says, we should build from a set of principles, which sound great to me: 1) We need to embrace open standards, because it leads to generative systems (with a very nice shout-out to JZ and his book, The Future of the Internet); 2) Build a simple system and then let it evolve. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
MillerOn July 1, 2009, U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
1. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
The law does contain certain exclusions from the lead limits. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
Contents 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
I think this is somewhat more persuasive than #1, but not very much so.3. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:11 pm
For taxpayers who "come clean" under the voluntary disclosure program, they will have to 1) pay back taxes due on the undisclosed assets for the last six years; 2) pay interest on the back taxes; and 3) pay a 20% accuracy penalty or a 25% delinquency penalty for each tax year at issue. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966), and include (1) the scope and content of the prior art, (2) the differences between the prior art and the claims, (3) the level of ordinary skill in the relevant art, and (4) any objective indicia of non-obviousness such as commercial success, long felt need, and failure of others. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
Cognizant of the delicate balance between the law firm's duty to clients and the law firm's own needs, a solution is needed.The attorney may wish to consider the use of the 468B QSF Solution where the same result could be achieved (i.e. the attorney can be paid right away), the Surrogate controls the distribution from the QSF and the distributees have the ability to structure.Requirements to Establish a QSFApproval Requirement Per Treasury Regulation… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:36 am
More on "Strategic Sandbagging": Let the Buyer Beware Reacting to this blog recently from John Jenkins, a member posed the question: why, given the virtually universal use of indemnification, does reliance matter? [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
2. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 11:40 pm
" Cases subsequent to this rule have, following this logic, required the party seeking imputation to prove (1) that a higher paying position is presently available, (2) that the allegedly underemployed spouse would probably be hired if he or she applied for the position, and (3) the specific salary offered by the position. [read post]
