Search for: "Motion"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 150,877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 5:17 am
Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Court): Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction Defendants Response Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for T Reply in Support of Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for TRO [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 5:18 am
Here: Appellant BriefAppellee Brief Lower court materials here: 18-motion-to-dismiss19-motion-to-dismiss20-reply22-motion-to-amend-complaint23-opposition24-reply26-dct-order [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:26 am
Pinoleville Pomo Nation First Amended Complaint Motion to Quash Opposition to Motion to Quash Reply to Motion to Quash [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:16 am
.): Minnesota Motion for TRO Minnesota Opposition Cashcall Motion to Dismiss Cashcall Opposition to Minnesota Motion for TRO The complaint is here. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:22 am
N.Y): 12-5 Onondaga Nation Motion to Dismiss 20-5 Onondaga County Motion to Dismiss 34-2 Oswego County Motion to Dismiss 45 DCT Order [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:20 am
Was Registrant Rolf Strothmann moved by any emotion when he received Petitioner Alco's motion for summary judgment partially cancelling his registration for the mark E-MOTION for golf carts, shopping cars, bicycles, mail delivery carts, and various other motorized, wheeled vehicles for moving people or things? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:48 pm
’s (“Openwave”) motion to strike Respondents Research In Motion Corporation and Research In Motion, Ltd. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Accordingly, Judge Krieger dismissed Nacchio’s Motion for New Trial. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm
The emergency motion is tabled for now; prosecutors apparently will look the filing over tonight. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:35 am
.): 60-nm-motion-to-dismiss-count-iv 64-nm-motion-to-stay 65-nm-motion-to-modify-pi-order 66-response-to-60 69-nm-motion-to-modify 71-motion-to-dismiss-counts-iii-iv 72-motion-to-dismiss-count-ii 73-motion-to-dismiss-count-v 79-reply-in-support-of-60 85-response-to-65 86-response-to-72 87-response-to-71 88-response-to-69 89-response-to-73 90-response-to-64 94-reply-in-support-of-69 95-reply-in-support-of-73 96-reply-in-support-of-65… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:06 am
The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his 2012 motion for modification of unallocated alimony and support, (2) granted the motion of the plaintiff...for attorney’s fees and awarded her $20,000, (3) denied the relief sought in his motion for reargument, and (4) denied his motion to open the judgment with respect to unallocated alimony and support. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:56 am
True, we didn’t raise this in our motion, concedes Nevin. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
Qualcomm case but not relevant to the motion for an enforcement stay:"Although the Supreme Court has created a safe harbor for above-cost discounting, it has not established a per se rule of non-liability under the antitrust laws for all contractual practices that involve above-cost pricing. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am
Nokia could refile (and maybe has).And last week, the Delhi High Court denied a key pretrial motion that Nokia had brought. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:41 pm
The OUII supported the motion in part. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
.): 57 Second Amended Complaint 67 State Motion to Dismiss 68 US Motion to Dismiss 69 US Motion to Transfer 70-1 Water District Motion to District 75 Tribe Opposition to 69 77 US Reply in Support of 69 80 Tribe Opposition to 70 81 Tribe Opposition to 68 82 Tribe Opposition to 67 89 Water District Reply in Support of 70 90 State Reply in Support of 67 91 US Reply in Support of 69 114 DCT Order [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 5:23 am
.): 54 Amended Complaint 58 Asner Motion to Compel 60 Asner Motion to Dismiss 63 Tribal Officials Motion to Compel 65 Tribal Officials Motion to Dismiss 76 Tribe Amicus Brief 95 Response to 76 96 Response to 63 97 Response to 58 98 Response to 65 99 Response to 60 102 Amicus Brief of Tribal Amici Curiae 103 Reply in Support of 58 104 Reply in Support of 60 105 Reply in Support of 63 106 Reply in Support of 65 107 Response to 102 109 DCT Order [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 12:08 pm
In a rapid-fire response, the Ryan Court in the Northern District of Texas this morning denied Plaintiff and Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Expedited Motion for Limited Reconsideration of the Scope of Preliminary Relief, and Plaintiff and Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for Expedited Consideration of their Motion for Limited Reconsideration of the Scope of Preliminary Relief (for more on these motions, see here). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:07 pm
The submission in support of the motion by plaintiff has established entitlement to judgement thus shifting the burden to defendant to rebut the motion by submitting proof in evidentiary form showing the existence of triable issues of fact. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:44 am
The First Department reversed the motion court's granting of summary judgment on tenant-plaintiff's cause of action for breach of the implied warranty of habitability, in Armstrong v. [read post]
