Search for: "People v. More"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 43,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Friedrichs v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
That was cited as authority in that case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:48 am
What’s more, I know some of the other people they accuse of being operatives and conspirators, and these accusations ring just as false. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
As the number of people becoming homeless from private sector accommodation continues to rise, and as private sector accommodation is used for discharge of duty and temporary accommodation by Councils, the issue of affordability becomes more and more important. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
So they entered into an agreement a while back where Neptune agreed to have enough urns etc. in its warehouse to cover all the people to whom they had already sold the stuff in advance. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:20 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:21 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:37 am
If we tell people: "Yes, you're right, but the law was unclear, so we're only going to apply this rule to people in the future," it's not worth expending tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees (or more) on the underlying battle just to benefit others. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
Henson v. [read post]
Identity Theft Crimes: Is it Criminal to Possess a Credit Card Number without the Actual Credit Card
17 Jan 2018, 2:08 am
In New York, the answer to these questions was given in People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
OPPO and Optis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 12:06 pm
Consider a more evocative example. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:51 pm
Let me add that I do not hold either the Palestinians or the Jews responsible for the misbehavior of Hamas or Netanyahu any more than I hold the Russian or Chinese people responsible for the autocracies that rule them. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:15 pm
[Language Log] * Louisiana seeks rehearing in Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
