Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 6841 - 6860 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 1:50 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix.
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against an adverse decision of the AIT and remitted the case to the Tribunal for reconsideration: see Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 222. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm by John Elwood
§ 922(g), which the court was holding for United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which Donald Trump has been trying to argue that he is immune from prosecution for acts taken while he was President (as Eugene noted here). [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
As a shipowner, he earned millions of dollars hauling cargo for the United States military. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by Ben Rubin
It was on the heels of these decisions that the California Supreme Court granted the petition for review in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:13 am by Amy Howe
The justices did not act on the petition for rehearing in Gundy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, as part of the lasting legacy of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am by Liz Hempowicz
Constitution and then engage in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or who give aid or comfort to enemies of the United States, are barred from serving ever again in public office. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case at bar, the petitioner's nolo contendere plea constitutes the conviction and the fact that adjudication was withheld has no bearing on whether the Florida crime constitutes a conviction for purposes of SORA akin to People v Mitch and United States v Hardeman. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm by Nikki Siesel
In the United States trademark common law rights are significant rights that cannot be overlooked. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm by Nikki Siesel
In the United States trademark common law rights are significant rights that cannot be overlooked. [read post]