Search for: "R. B."
Results 6841 - 6860
of 55,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 4:51 am
This exemption, however does not remove the notice requirement under 1798.100(b) or exempt the data from consumer private right of action under Section 1798.150. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:47 pm
(B) To attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of a legislative body to adopt or amend a zoning ordinance. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:09 am
For instance, Hurricane Dorian forced the cancellation of one of the Rolling Stones’ concerts at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami, as well as the cancellation of R&B singer Chris Brown’s concert in Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) Case Note Introduction In Bridges, an application for judicial review, the UK High Court (Lord Justice Haddon-Cave and Mr. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:02 am
Comm’r, T.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:30 am
If the 808 audits cited as fatally flawed in the inspection reports were as bad as the reports said, it appears that the audit cop could have fined the audit firms more than $1.6 billion—that’s billion, with a “b. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:06 pm
” Current Good Manufacturing Practice (Subpart B): “Your plant equipment and utensils used in manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding food are not designed and of such material and workmanship as to be adequately cleanable, and are not maintained adequately to protect against allergen cross-contact and contamination. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 6:30 pm
A Global Survey of Aspirations and Intentions to Migrate," International Migration, Early View, 15 Aug. 2019Law Reviews“Forced Human Displacement, the Third World and International Law: A TWAIL Perspective,” Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol. 20, no. 1 (July 2019)"L’immigration Irrégulière dans l’Espace Euro-méditerranéen et la Protection des Droits Fondamentaux," Revue Québécoise de Droit International,… [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:05 pm
This amounted to a defence that the application had been made (s.95(3)(b) Housing Act 2004) or under s.95(4) that they had a reasonable excuse for not completing the application, and it was for the applicants to show, to the criminal standard, that it was not reasonable. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
Last week during IPWatchdog’s Patent Masters Symposium, former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel sat down with me to discuss the state of the U.S. patent system and best options/ predictions for moving forward. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Appels d’un jugement de la Cour supérieure ayant accueilli en partie une demande en réclamation de dommages-intérêts et ayant accueilli une demande en réclamation d’une somme d’argent. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:15 am
[…] Für das Mandat […] war Treadwell angefragt worden. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
Consider it for yourselves, though; here is Chief Justice Judith Nakamura's majority opinion: Rule 11-505(B) NMRA, New Mexico's spousal communication privilege, provides that "[a] person has a privilege to refuse to disclose, or to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication by the person to that person's spouse while they were married. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:21 am
B. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 4:43 am
" Yet they can be assigned different locations in this sentence: "Because of a, the action b, so that c. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
§ 1396a(r)(2) and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:32 am
On June 14, 2019, some 51 cities and counties filed a motion for certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) negotiation class, drawing objections from State Attorneys General pursuing their own state court claims, and an order from the Court allowing Plaintiffs to re-brief their motion in light of the objections. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
11 NYCRR § 243.2(b). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:55 pm
Another way of looking at it is if you have two tenants – Tenant A and Tenant B, where Tenant A’s landlords use a managing agent and Tenant B’s landlord manage the property themselves. [read post]
