Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 6841 - 6860 of 9,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2022, 7:37 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s v New Street Area Development, LLC : Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division: No A-1603-20 [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:59 pm by Sheila Velez Martinez
She ended up in a privately-run detention center in Elizabeth, New Jersey, from which she could have been deported at any time. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm by Gordon Firemark
Court, CD California 2007 – Google Scholar “Big Pimpin” at Ninth Circuit As Jay-Z, Music Publishers Win bAffirmation of Summary Judgment FAIR USE: More about the Jersey Boys Sofa Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:38 pm by Sam Bayard
Lynch Jr., Mayor of Bordentown, New Jersey, convinced the City Commission to pass the resolution by a 2-1 vote last night. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
Last week, both houses of the New Jersey state legislature passed a bill to abolish the state's death penalty, a measure the governor has promised to sign. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:21 am by Michael DelSignore
As part of his reason for denying the evidentiary hearing, the trial judge relied on the case of State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:34 pm
was published in the July 18, 2005 issue of the New Jersey Law Journal. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Richard Frank
New Jersey, which held that federal juries, rather than judges, must decide any facts leading to enhanced criminal penalties. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 11:38 am by Nathan Meyer
  Regarding regulatory estoppel, the District Court noted this defense is a New Jersey state law defense, no other state has adopted this defense, and this defense has been rejected by almost every state and federal court to consider it. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 11:38 am by Nathan Meyer
  Regarding regulatory estoppel, the District Court noted this defense is a New Jersey state law defense, no other state has adopted this defense, and this defense has been rejected by almost every state and federal court to consider it. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 7:54 am by Erin Lynch
The decision opened the door for the plaintiff state of New Jersey, and any other state, to begin allowing sports gambling. [read post]