Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:45 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:08 am
Penal Law §120.25 Not 'Crime of Violence' Under USSG §4B1.2(a)(2) United States, appellee v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:29 pm
Case Name: Northfork Citizens for Responsible Dev. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:12 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven G. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:45 am
Berrino F, Krogh V et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
STEVENS, J., GINSBURG, J., and BREYER, J., filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
That was the ruling in Rapanos v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Adams v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:01 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:54 pm
In Julian v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:27 pm
According to this Court, in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
Stevens CBS v. [...] [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:30 pm
Stevens, and CBS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
CBS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
CBS v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Stevens, No. 05-2497 Conviction for selling depictions of animal cruelty is vacated, and the statute itself, 18 U.S.C. section 48, is declared unconstitutional, where: 1) the criminalization of depictions of animal cruelty, rather than of the acts of cruelty themselves, is a content-based regulation on speech; 2) the speech in question does not constitute a new category of unprotected speech; and 3) the government has not shown that the statute is narrowly tailored, using the least… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
