Search for: "See v. See" Results 6841 - 6860 of 121,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
On February 2, 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a decision in Gordon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Go See What They're Doing at the Patent Office https://t.co/Iol47PlDFE -> Still Alice: Not all software patents are being invalidated under Alice Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm by Bexis
We don't see many successful applications of preemption with respect to 510k, Class II medical devices since Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:56 am by J
If the case-law is to be believed, local authorities have a hard enough time introducing selective licensing schemes as it is (see R (Peat) v Hyndburn and R (Regas) v Enfield)). [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:13 am by LII Team
 (See the accompanying article, Fair Use & Free Law) International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:56 pm by Donald Thompson
A blood sample collected outside statutory guidelines must be suppressed (see People v Olmstead, 233 AD2d 837 [4th Dept 1996]; People v Ebner, 195 AD2d 1006, 1007 [4th Dept 1993]).Along with the method of its collection, a blood sample’s reliability depends on the sample’s storage. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:55 pm
08.12.2011) Thrown for a Loss: Retired Players Sue, Claim NFL Hid Brain Damage Info, ABA Journal (See prior entries National Football League and Sports in New York, Part 1 02.07.2011 and National Football League and Sports in New York, Part 2 02.10.2011) Amid Stacks of Paper, 'E-Court' is Finally in Session, The New York Times (See prior entry Filing Tort Cases in the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System (NYSCEF) 06.12.2011) Employees' Facebook Pages… [read post]