Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:12 am
Content Regulation * State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
* State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:42 pm
What if I left the United States for a short trip? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am
In the United States, the legislative model has failed to ensure a fair criminal justice system. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:59 am
Arbitrator Das’ award can be found at the APWU website here.California Supreme Court determines courts cannot compel arbitration if the issue conflicts with the Education CodeIn United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:27 pm
On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
The enforceability of the various notice provisions particularly with short timelines can vary from state to state and even within jurisdictions within a state. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Rix LJ found it significant Campbell and others v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Did Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Scalia vote as they did in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:05 pm
See generally Knox v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The 1994 Campbell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am
Switzerland (no. 2) no. 32772/02, § 92, ECHR 2009 (rearing of animals)[Grand Chamber- GC]; Steel and Morris v . the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 89 and 95, ECHR 2005-II (fast-food meat industry); Hashman and Harrup v . the United Kingdom[GC], no. 25594/94 (hunting saboteurs); Steel and Others v . the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998 (hunting saboteurs); Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
Gore, Citizens United, and NFIB -- and perhaps Fisher v. [read post]
