Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
After graduating as the valedictorian of her class, Lutie returned to her university to teach law in 1897 and became the first woman in the United States to teach at a chartered law school. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
Superior Court; Nichols v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
Superior Court; Nichols v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
The court distinguished United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm
United States 22-644Issues: (1) Whether, pursuant to Kisor v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:50 am
Walgreens challenged this distinction on state and federal constitutional grounds, claiming violation of the equal protection clauses of the California and United States constitutions. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:59 am
Walgreens challenged this distinction on state and federal constitutional grounds, claiming violation of the equal protection clauses of the California and United States constitutions. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:02 am
Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California has just (this morning by Pacific Time) handed down two decisions denying a couple of Qualcomm motions for preliminary injunctions. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:18 pm
The court of appeal relied on the United States Supreme Court 's decision in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:23 am
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:30 am
JMBM's Special Assets Team has represented hundreds of lenders in California and throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:26 pm
Jones v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
California. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
