Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 6841 - 6860
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Mike Dawson, "Judge to consider whether Cynthia Baldwin represented Penn State or Graham Spanier in Sandusky case," Centre Daily Times, Dec. 18, 2013.Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2013/12/18/3948448/judge-to-consider-whether-cynthia.html#storylink=cpy(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)A particularly interesting issue arises when the underlying ownership of the autonomous enterprise passes from one group to another, resulting in changes in management. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
Since Judge Posner's opinion in McReynolds v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
Chafin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
My first involvement in litigation centered on this question was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
Touby cited and distinguished an earlier case—United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
After the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
§201.57(c)(6)(i) (emphasis added). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
The case is captioned Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
Evil": Miguel Angel Cotto v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:09 am
Recently, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) heard a case, Golchin v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:09 am
They are: Hooker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
C 11-03474 (N.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
Google’s own amicus brief in this case states it receives &ldqu [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am
Instead, on appeal the DC Circuit takes precedent seriously and tries to square the NSA surveillance program with United States v. [read post]