Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 6841 - 6860 of 11,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 11:24 am by admin
 63(1) an employee of seven months is entitled to notice or pay in lieu of one week. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
At the time, the court was told little of a SEVEN YEAR LONG complaints process, after the law firm in which Ms Crabbe was a partner, folded. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 2:59 pm by Doorey
 63(1) an employee of seven months is entitled to notice or pay in lieu of one week. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
The items sold by Costco were not in fact Tiffany items—not even in the way that other higher-end watches, for instance, sold by Costco are the real things (even if not every higher-end watchmaker is happy about it; see Omega S.A. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
  At this point I’m reminded of the opening statement of one Vincent LaGuardia Gambini in the fictitional trial of Alabama v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Seven of those states have since repealed those limitations. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The parties separated in 2002, after living together for seven years. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
  Compare this level of state participation with, for example, the amicus brief filed by all forty-nine other states in Maryland v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
But I am aware of only one case that suggests that TRIPS might be relevant for interpreting U.S. substantive law: in Rotec Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
 Like here (in a case involving State Farm, no less), here and here. [read post]