Search for: "United States v. Justice"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 32,502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:42 am
United States Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:09 pm
Gore, Citizens United, and so on). [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Judge Reeves assumes that whether an officer's physical intrusion into a car is reasonable is governed by a Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
Under Solem v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
Among other feats, Judge Allen was the first woman in America appointed prosecutor (1919), elected to a general trial court (1920), elected to a state supreme court (1922), and shortlisted for nomination to the United States Supreme Court (1938). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:34 am
United States, a 1953 Supreme Court case that invoked sovereign immunity over one of Justice Robert Jackson's crackerjack dissents. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
United States, Humphrey’s Executor, and Morrison v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:35 pm
"The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court decision in Mcgirt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
One of the agencies, Catholic Social Services, sued, arguing that it has a free exercise right to do business with the city while continuing to discriminate against same-sex couples, whose marriage rights are protected by the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
In the case of Gibbons v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Putting in question the state power of eminent domain certainly seemed to go nowhere, but I think there is an argument to be made with respect to Rehnquist Court’s federalism decisions having a highly consequential doctrinal and policy payoff under Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” And in Consumers Union v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:36 pm
Our amicus in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
