Search for: "A P.2." Results 6861 - 6880 of 26,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 6:00 am
  Most commonly, C&P exams are used to (1) confirm or deny service connection, and/or (2) establish the severity of a veteran’s disability. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
CHAMPIONS OF THE GIST (ANALYSIS) BRING ON A BIG CHILL  ON PRESS FREEDOMS IN TEXAS  Using its power to amend the "common law" the homogeneously Republican Texas Supreme Court has seen fit to exempt an entire industry (the legal profession) from the civil tort system by granting it "attorney immunity", but when it comes to a less captive audience, it's a different matter, even when the rights at issue are of constitutional dimensions. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:30 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El Tribunal Supremo de Nueva Jersey impuso la suspensión recomendada el 2 de octubre. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:49 am by Brad Kuhn
  Caltrans filed an eminent domain action to acquire portions of two residential lots owned by the Sanis (parcels 1 and 2); the Sanis then filed a cross-complaint for inverse condemnation for additional damages to easements in favor of a third residence they owned (parcel 3). [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:51 am by Administrator
Debot, 1989 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140, at p.1168. [18] Given that this was an anonymous tip, there was no evidence regarding the tipster’s credibility. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm by Patricia Hughes
This is consistent with the fiduciary relationship between the doctor and the patient (CPSO, Practice Guide/a>, p.5; Norberg v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm by Caroline Lee
  Rather, the Sixth Circuit’s decision binds only federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.13 Accordingly, California public agencies remain free to argue that that the decision was wrongly decided because (1) chalking does not constitute a “search” and (2) chalking is reasonable as a matter of law even if it constitutes a search. 1. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:25 pm by Doug Stephens, IV
 From May 2 to May 8, the destroyer USS William P. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:53 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
These grounds as explained in p. 26 to 29 of Associate Builders would apply.An award which shocks the conscience of the court is likely to be set aside under this ground. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:28 pm by José Guillermo
La imagen puede contener: 2 personas, personas sonriendo, texto Manuel Sanchez Chuquillanqui ¡Tales postulantes!. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
As for Vine, there was one dissent in the Fifth Circuit, while on the state side the trial court in the first instance denied the motion to compel, and one of three justices on the court of appeal agreed with that disposition.Taking the individual judicial decisionmaker as the relevant unit of analysis, the tally is 8+2 = 10 judges in favor of arbitration vs. 2 judges against on the state side, while on the federal side the tally is 1+2+1 = 4 judges against arbitration vs.… [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Recientemente, el 30 de abril de 2019, la Subcomisión celebró una vista pública con motivo de la celebración del Día Internacional de la Propiedad Intelectual que se enfocó en la investigación del rol de la propiedad intelectual en los deportes y la seguridad pública. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[Longtime LHB readers will recall that for the exam in my legal history course at Georgetown Law i write an essay about some regulatory regime I did not cover in class and ask students to draw comparisons with those we did. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Ashworth v Nine Network Australia (No.2) ([2019] NSWDC 188) Gibson DCJ dismissed defamation claims for a broadcast and three online newspaper publications imputing that he is famous for sleazy scams and shonky businesses and that he engaged in dishonest business activities to trick young women into group sex. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Finally, the Policy on MAiD makes reference to the CPSO Policy Statement #2-15 – Professional Obligations and Human Rights Policy which has a general provision for conscientious objectors. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:00 am by Steve Matthews
., l’usager doit démontrer, par une preuve prépondérante: 1) que le bien comporte un danger; 2) que l’usager subit un préjudice; et 3) qu’il existe un lien de causalité entre les 2, c’est-à-dire que le préjudice constitue la matérialisation concrète du danger. [read post]