Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 6861 - 6880 of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2006, 1:45 pm
On the other hand, assume a system in which the first plaintiff to get to court receives a judgment awarding compensatory damages plus all $100 million in punitive damages that due process would allow. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:08 am
This case makes plain the substantial burden facing a plaintiff in a trip and fall case. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Many say things like “eliminates all types of odor,” promise elimination of “100% of your scent” or “all human odor,” or use graphics indicating that odor can’t escape the fabric. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 The plaintiff also disclosed that the pair went on several outings and holidays together, and the Deceased paid for all of the trips. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  As with all A-Z cases, the plaintiff ingested Aredia or Zometa as part of cancer treatment and claimed to have suffered osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) as a result. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
  Resolving the intended use issue at the early stage of the litigation seemed a bit daunting to the court, so it simply assumed that all of the products were "Drugs” as defined by the FDCA. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The agreement provided for the monthly payment of $5,000 for the first five years, $10,000 for the next five years, and $15,000 for the final five years, with all payments inclusive of interest at the rate of 18% per annum. [read post]
  The plaintiff proposed a class that consisted of all nationwide purchasers of Omega 3 Mood for the four-year period preceding the filing of the suit. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:33 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Just because the notice might be insufficient as to one plaintiff does not necessarily mean that it is insufficient as to all the plaintiffs. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:33 am by Stanley D. Baum
Also, the Court said that the Plan's break-in-service provisions do not apply to a worker-like the plaintiff- who has satisfied all pension eligibility requirements and is already entitled to retire. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:20 am
Defendants counterclaimed against Plaintiff for reimbursement of the wages paid to Plaintiff during his suspension and moved for summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s other claims. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:55 am
In all, the Court of Appeals raised the damages owed to the plaintiff from $193,000 to $238,000. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm by emagraken
 33. [14]         In my view, having considered all of the foregoing circumstances, the offer was not one that the defendant ought reasonably to have accepted. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit has denied a defendant the defense of laches against a plaintiff despite the fact that the plaintiff waited seven years to assert its trademark rights - all because the defendant had (in the majority's view) not spent that enough money developing the alleged infringing mark as its own (and thus was not prejudiced by the delay). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm by Bexis
  The court found all of these theories “essentially nonexistent” against a non-manufacturer, and that there was no evidence that the branded defendant was somehow an licensee, agent, or co-conspirator with the generic manufacturer. [read post]