Search for: "Bill Judge" Results 6861 - 6880 of 34,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Kalvis Golde
Briefly: At The Hill, Nathaniel Weixel reports that this week Texas and 17 other conservative states, responding to a pair of petitions pending before the Supreme Court over a lawsuit challenging the Affordable Care Act, urged the justices not “to take up the case without first waiting for a decision from a district court judge in Texas. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 6:45 am by John Jascob
Commenters on this second SEC proposal can judge whether it aligns more nearly with the highly restrictive House bill or the more modest Senate bill (See H.R. 4015—reintroduced in the 116th Congress as H.R. 5116—and S. 3614). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:19 pm by HSnader
Civil lawsuits may be filed by the victim in order to recover damages such as medical bills for bodily injury, pains and moral damages. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:20 pm by Welcome
 An identical bill in the house, House Bill 1145, was sponsored by Rep. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 1:57 pm by Steve Lash
Larry Hogan’s legislative proposal to require a state commission to compile the violent crime sentences handed down by each Maryland circuit court judge, saying the bill could spur harsher sentences from jurists fearful of being criticized by the governor as too lenient. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 10:58 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
  Such a prioritization of the traditional population over the expansion population has been rejected by Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
Blackman notes that Chief Justice William Rehnquist “skipped the 1999 address during the impeachment trial” of President Bill Clinton, while “all nine Justices stayed home” during Clinton’s 2000 address. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Evan Caminker
His broad assertion that the concept of non-criminal “abuse of power” was rejected by the Framers because it, like “maladministration,” is too vague reflects a cramped reading of the relevant history and ignores two centuries of congressional impeachment practice and rhetoric (including those surrounding both the Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton episodes). [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes
If we can get rid of the lawyers and judges and jurors, maybe we’ve got something. [read post]
Recognizing the confounding state of the law on patent eligibility, Federal Circuit judges have almost universally recognized the need for Supreme Court intervention. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm by Melanie Fontes
  The 1973 OLC memo was reiterated in an October 2000 OLC memo after the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 10:28 am by Steve Gottlieb
The new bail law empowers judges – in the right way. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:30 am by bcuban
  His bill to us was in part to pay that gift forward,  It has been paid and will continue to be. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Taking up the question on remand from the Sixth Circuit, which punted the issue, the district court’s chief judge reversed his earlier holding that the federal immigration law barred recovery. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Surveillance IThe Law Society Gazette had a piece “Judge unhappy with late surveillance evidence – but allows it anyway”. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:39 am by Nassiri Law
The Charlotte Observer reported the judge based his reasoning on the fact that CBD oil is legal under federal and North Carolina laws – even if it contains trace amounts of THC. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 3:51 am by SHG
But Holmes has fallen from grace, and didn’t land on a cushion of hundred dollar bills. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Darragh, 95 So. 3d 897, 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (finding “no error in the trial court’s decision to allow testimony of the full amount of Darragh’s past medical bills … The trial court properly treated the lesser amount negotiated for payment by Darragh’s private health insurer as a collateral source set-off to be made by the judge after trial”) (citation omitted); Durse v. [read post]