Search for: "Centers v. State" Results 6861 - 6880 of 22,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 5:03 pm by Thomas Robinson, J.D.
., writer for Lexis Nexis Workers Comp Law Center reports. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:40 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Forest Grove Sch Dist v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
However, Peter King of Sports Illustrated stated that the decision may not be the champagne-popping moment for the NFLPA. [read post]
In the City of Baltimore’s case, the City asserted several state-law causes of action centered on the alleged misleading promotion, and failure to warn about the dangers of, fossil-fuel products. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
A provision in the law states that if the death penalty is struck down, predators can still be sentenced to life in prison. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:04 pm
Indeed, Resolution D-016 passed by General Convention in 2012 began as a direction to the Executive Council to sell the Church Center, but as finally adopted by both Houses, it stated only:"Resolved, That it is the will of this Convention to move the Church Center headquarters away from the Church Center building at 815 2nd Avenue, New York City. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by Peter Margulies
The exigency of this situation, the Iranian hostage crisis, or the interdiction on the high seas in Haitian Centers Council v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:40 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,923,721 entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAINTAINING GAME STATE and owned by Bally Gaming, Inc.. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:25 am by Erin Miller
  One hopes that, 55 years after Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:40 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,923,721 entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAINTAINING GAME STATE and owned by Bally Gaming, Inc.. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]