Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6861 - 6880 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Hydro-Québec c. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
CRL employed all of Unilever’s UK-based research staff: it was not a trading company, but a wholly-owned subsidiary of Unilever plc. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:48 pm by Donald Clarke
According to the Financial Times, "China has ordered state-owned enterprises to cut ties with US consulting companies such as McKinsey and Boston Consulting Group because of fears they are spying on behalf of the US government. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:59 am by Dennis Crouch
A £25 million project is so small that it does not even reach Unilever company management – how then could it be outstanding? [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
Question #2 – L1 Intra-Company Transferee I am in China, and hope to move to US. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:17 pm by m zamora
 The Act excludes from the definition of a dietary supplement a product represented for use as a conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or the diet [21 USC 321(ff)(2)(B)]. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Sutherland LNG
  According to the article, the four companies and their primary owners are: Pacific NorthWest LNG (Petronas); LNG Canada Development (Shell Canada Energy); Prince Rupert LNG (BG Group); and the Kitimat LNG project (affiliates of Chevron Corp. and Apache Corp.). [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Sutherland LNG
  According to the article, the four companies and their primary owners are: Pacific NorthWest LNG (Petronas); LNG Canada Development (Shell Canada Energy); Prince Rupert LNG (BG Group); and the Kitimat LNG project (affiliates of Chevron Corp. and Apache Corp.). [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Donald and Rochelle Sterling, the LA Clippers, Racism, and California Family Law: An Outsider's Brief Legal Analysis By: Michael C. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(b) Identification of the Judge with the Objectives of an Organization When judges raise money for charitable or civic causes it publically identifies them with the objectives of the organization for whom the solicitations Where made.[102] When a judge identifies himself or herself either voluntarily or as a consequence of involvement with a cause or issue this heightens the risk that the public could question the judge’s neutrality.[103] For instance, the public may view a judge that… [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:28 am
That's why, for example, Company A might say "no thanks, we're not writing that" and Company B might say "hey, we'll give you a great rate! [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am by MBettman
Myers Co. 2012-Ohio-5317,that worker just does not get the statutory presumption set forth in subsection (C), but can proceed under sections (A) or (B). [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:54 pm
Assuming a 6% tax rate, this equates to $1.1 billion, with a "b," of alleged unreported sales. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:49 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)This post considers the quite thorny issue of the way enterprises might approach their obligations to respect human rights under the GPs. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:55 am by Robert Chesney
§§ 1028A(a)(1), (b), (c)(4), and 2 2 years (mandatory consecutive). 30 Economic espionage. 18 U.S.C. [read post]