Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court" Results 6861 - 6880 of 99,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2023, 11:15 am by Steve Brachmann
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit affirms the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s invalidation of VirnetX patent claims supporting a $502 million verdict against Apple; the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 8:54 am by Gene Takagi
The Supreme Court wrestles with questions over the Navajo Nation’s water rights (Becky Sullivan, NPR) A course meant to inspire more Black students to take AP classes sparked a culture war instead (Michelle Garcia, NBC News) No, my Japanese American parents were not ‘interned’ during WWII. [read post]
  As to the latter category, the Supreme Court has recognized that an employer may hire an employee “to do nothing, or do nothing but to wait for something to happen. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
She is married to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 2:48 am by Jacob Wirz
Vigil, 508 U.S. 180, 196 (1993), for example, the Supreme Court held that policy statements about how an agency plans to exercise a discretionary power are exempt from notice-and-comment requirements under the APA. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
In light of the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:36 pm
“Our thinking is that our rules ought to be in conformity with the [Supreme Court’s] rules with respect to that,” said U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
The latter prong of the investigation led to the Supreme Court case Trump v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:52 pm by Tom Smith
The Supreme Court has already made the distinction between content and conduct as a legal matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Ryan McCoy, Alex Simon, and Cary Burke Seyfarth Synopsis: Recently, the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 1:50 pm
District Court, Northern District of California in 2010 and at the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 12:23 pm by Stuart N. Brotman
.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, raises First Amendment concerns that the government may not be able to justify under the constitutional strict scrutiny test of the Supreme Court that likely would apply in this case. [read post]