Search for: "Court v. State" Results 6861 - 6880 of 208,050
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Later this month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:30 am
"Our holding allows military courts to protect the integrity of their dispositions and processes by granting relief from final judgments in extraordinary cases when it is shown that there were fundamental flaws in the proceedings leading to their issuance," said Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote for the court.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:15 am by John McFarland
Yesterday the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in DeVillier et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 5:41 pm by appealattorneylaw
   Had the attorney handling Knox’s appeal done so, Judge Hazouri stated that the Court would have reversed on that basis, too. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:26 pm by Phil Cave
  An investigating officer has recommended that Army private Bradley Manning face court martial on multiple criminal charges related to the downloading of nearly 1 million war logs and secret diplomatic cables. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:48 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am by Brendan Kevenides
 In so doing, the court admitting that it was disagreeing with another federal district court in that state, Cordy v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:26 pm by Lawrence Solum
Anderson, the Supreme Court unanimously held that states lack the unilateral power to exclude presidential candidates from the ballot on the basis of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:41 am by Addison Morris
[JURIST] The Virginia House of Delegates [official website] on Thursday unanimously passed a bill [SB 14] to remove the state code's ban on oral and anal sex, a decade after it was invalidated by a US Supreme Court [official website] decision in Lawrence v. [read post]