Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 17,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 4:16 pm
The PTO examiner determined that the invention did not constitute patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
Simonyi paid $35 million for his second space tourist trek. [read post]
20 May 2012, 11:29 am
It appears Saverin prefers a tax plan that does not require his death. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:02 am
This should immediately strike one as odd because one does not usually think of Kerala or Pondicherry as the most crime-ridden parts of India. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 5:36 pm
Also, any investment vehicle that’s already tax-free or tax-deferred absolutely, positively, does not belong in a tax-deferred account. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:58 am
" Inducement is defined by 35 U.S.C. 271(b). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:33 pm
Rather than requiring a patentee to wait for infringement by manufacture or sale under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
SEB S.A. required retrial on the issue of intent under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm
Rule 35(f). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:52 pm
., (here) the Central District of California found that IPR estoppel applies where the same IPR reference is later raised under the “known or used” prong of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
Thus, Section 5 of the Patent Act of 1790 is not related to the “first to invent” provisions of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g), but rather are akin to the provisions of the current 35 U.S.C. 102(a), where an inventor is not entitled to a patent if someone else previously invented. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
But the employee had 35 years of seniority. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:50 am
§ 321(a) or inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:15 am
According to reports, a semi-truck was traveling northbound on Interstate 35 West. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
It does not give the Office the right to spend the money it collects. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:33 am
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:49 am
- Does the method necessarily require specialized software? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
Hart, 35 Va. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am
For claims not appropriately supported in the original disclosure, the parent application is treated like any other reference under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
