Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2011, 7:34 pm
Changes to 35 U.S.C. 287(a) now allow patent holders to substitute the patent number with a website address, if the website contains a list of patents covering the article. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 pm
Firstly, the written statement filed under Rule 1 may itself contain a counter-claim which in the light of Rule 1 read with Rule 6-A would be a counter- claim against the claim of the appellant preferred in exercise of legal right conferred by Rule 6-A. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
“The federal tax returns and audited financials clearly show the proposed buyout of your 35 percent share is more than equitable. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
As Dorothy Leczykiewicz says, the amended provision is very ambiguous: On the one hand the Charter does not form part of the Treaties, but on the other it is attributed the same legal value as the Treaties. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
A person in the 35 percent tax bracket does not pay 35 percent on all of his income, but rather only on the income above a certain level. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:10 pm
Second, this provision addresses a problem that does not exist. . . . [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:44 pm
Why does this provision exist? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:53 pm
[7] See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:01 pm
At least three aspects of the Act are likely to impact the quantity and quality of disclosures: the changes to the novelty rules of 35. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:55 pm
" 1:35:35 — Are you Republicans a bunch of crazy cranks? [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
If a patient does not recover after conservative care and pain management, then a surgerical evaluation is usually the next step. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:22 pm
If the individual does not make the full payment within the correct time period, his or her COBRA coverage can be canceled. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
The “Safe-harbor” Provision, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:31 pm
Cir. 2008), which set forth the “machine-or-transformation” test as the proper test for determining the patentability of a process under 35 U.S.C. section 101. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
. #1. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:52 am
Here, however, the defendant does not seek to invalidate or repudiate either the billing statements or the retainer agreement between the parties. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
But only in ECUSA does a minority see itself as "entitled" to override the freely and legally expressed will of the majority, and to punish them for exercising it.) [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
United StatesCourt: U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-2311 : September 1, 2011 Judge: CUDAHY Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Government Contracts, Health Law, Injury Law, Medical Malpractice A newborn suffered severe brain damage because doctors failed to promptly diagnose and treat an infection contracted at his 2003 birth. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
United StatesCourt: U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-2311 : September 1, 2011 Judge: CUDAHY Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Government Contracts, Health Law, Injury Law, Medical Malpractice A newborn suffered severe brain damage because doctors failed to promptly diagnose and treat an infection contracted at his 2003 birth. [read post]
