Search for: "Head v State"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 14,744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
Agata heads up our preservation efforts to microfilm material that is too fragile to remain in paper form. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:24 am
State – Prior Bad Acts Under Rule 404, Feb. 17, 2015, Birmingham DUI Defense Lawyer Blog [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
John Fund to overrule Basic v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
David V. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Today, a divided Court resolved Kingsley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
., v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:22 am
No. 14-1253 Title: Anna Cladakis, Petitioner v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Maryland to NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:31 am
Since I head the Denver office, I usually post about events in the midwest. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:45 am
Also, signs which cannot be seen -- such as smells -- may be registered in so far as they can be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, as the Court of Justice of the European Union indicated in Case C-273/00 Sieckmann v DPMA. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm
The Crown’s submission is in effect an invitation to delegate the courts’ constitutional obligation to the prosecutors employed by the state, leaving the threat of a grossly disproportionate sentence hanging over an accused’s head. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
The United States Attorney did not want the death penalty. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
See Barone v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
In EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch, the High Court reversed a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that favored an employer's right to uphold a corporate dress code; in this case, it was Abercrombie's "no head wear" policy.The case involves the intersection of fashion, commerce and the freedom of religious expression under the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Is the committee headed towards hearings? [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Hyder, No. 14-0302, was highly anticipated, but left many of us scratching our heads. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Hyder, No. 14-0302, was highly anticipated, but left many of us scratching our heads. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Hyder, No. 14-0302, was highly anticipated, but left many of us scratching our heads. [read post]
