Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
The Court stated that California state courts have not embraced the Ninth Circuit’s narrow restraint exception and stated “no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts have been clear in their expression that section 16660 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat” (citing Scott… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court recently issued its long-awaited ruling in Knick v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently issued its decision in Young v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:39 am
Magee v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am
Thaler, in which the Court held that when a state’s procedural framework makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:48 am
The case is Griffin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
State Physicians Ins. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
Harris v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
Lucas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am
Many disputes in closely-held companies feature one outspoken owner feuding with a united group of the remaining owners over management or participation in the company. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
However, in Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers ([2001] EWHC 32 (QB)) Butler-Sloss P held that such an injunction could be granted in support of an action for breach of confidence. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 2:56 pm
v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
In its judgment in Case C-73/08 Nicolas Bressol and others v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:22 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit held that summary judgment had been improperly granted based on the penal law rule, however, it also held that because Brazil was seeking assistance from the United States Attorney General in enforcing its forfeiture judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2467, the District Court should allow Brazil and the Attorney General time to complete this process before taking further action in the case.The decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:10 am
In Maymulakhin & Markiv v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:05 am
In Trombetta v Kruse, (NY Civ. [read post]
