Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 123,269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
However, where, as here, the agency "fails to inform the person [or entity] making the FOIL request that further administrative review of the determination is available, the requirement of exhaustion [of administrative remedies] is excused (Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738, Matter of Barrett v Morgenthau, 74 NY2d 907; [see Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648]; 7. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:41 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:39 pm
Maril, From Liberation To (Re)Criminalization: Dobbs v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
My law practice lives and breathes the science of foodborne illness epidemiology. [read post]
7 May 2023, 10:05 am
The interdependence of Brussels I bis Regulation and Rome II Regulation It is true that in the interpretation of Article 4(1) Regulation 864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, the CJEU ruled that, damages connected with the death of a person due to such an accident within the Member State of the trial court, suffered by the victim’s relatives residing in another Member State, must be characterized as “indirect results” of the said accident,… [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:55 am
Shields and United States v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
In rare circumstances, courts may need expert testimony on how a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood a certain term at the time the patent application was filed. [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:49 am
Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 8:58 am
” Wood v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 7:18 am
From RB v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 1:03 am
He appeared with Catrin Evans KC for Tech UK in the Supreme Court in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:42 pm
At least following Bush v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:33 am
"]] From Wednesday's opinion in State v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:29 am
In Point Energy Partners Permian, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:28 am
L v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:17 am
” The underlying lawsuit, captioned Redbot Security, LLC et. al v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:11 am
The license shall be (i) non-exclusive and non-assignable; (ii) have a scope and duration that is limited to the scope and duration of the crisis; (iii) be strictly limited to the relevant activities of crisis-relevant product in the Union; (iv) only be granted against payment of adequate remuneration; (v) be limited to the territory of the Union and (vi) only be granted to a person deemed to be in a position to exploit the protected invention in a manner that permits the proper… [read post]
5 May 2023, 7:48 am
In 1863, in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
