Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 54,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
NRDC based on “separation-of-powers principles. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:30 am
Particularly, interesting are two issues in the ongoing Cromer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:18 am
In a 5-4 decision in Seila Law v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Mayor sought to invalidate Resolution R20-78, which was passed by the Common Council and authorized the Common Council to retain its own counsel in a dispute with the Mayor over the separation of powers between the Mayor and the Common Council. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:18 am
" Webasto Thermo & Comfort North America, Inc. et al v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
New Central Coal Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:44 am
Furthermore, in the absence of a taking of land, negotiations for the purchase of the lands does not, and should not, attract a claim for costs, merely because the potential buyer has the power, if fully exercised, to expropriate. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Farnan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:54 pm
Parenthetically, this decision in no way constitutes an evidentiary ruling in the event that the Noseworthy doctrine (Noseworthy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
The case is Torres v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 11:28 am
That 2010 high court opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 7:08 am
In Yoder v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 3:31 pm
In addition, such a shift could help alleviate some of the constitutional issues that cast doubt on the legitimacy of our current system, such as Article III questions highlighted by the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Stern v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 2:54 pm
The appellate court noted that the disclaimer was in writing and signed by the disclaimant, and thus the statute of frauds was met.Lee v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm
This Article concludes with a brief commentary on the Supreme Court’s January 2021 decision in City of Chicago v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:00 am
Constitutional scholars view the Bank Veto as the archetypal statement of "departmentalism," the view that each branch of the government has the power and duty to interpret the Constitution for itself. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 12:13 am
Although National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:54 pm
Both bills will codify the precedent set by the Sixth Circuit, which ruled in US v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:07 am
Indeed, the party out of power achieved the most important policy success of the last two years: the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
