Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 173,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2018, 11:44 am
The New York State Human Rights Law has been expanded to cover non-employees. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 11:44 am
The New York State Human Rights Law has been expanded to cover non-employees. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
(Eugene Volokh) From the amicus brief for 48 states plus D.C. supporting Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:02 pm
L.A., LLC, 327 P.3d 129 (Cal. 2014), the California Supreme Court held that where “an employment agreement compels the waiver of representative claims under the PAGA, it is contrary to public policy and unenforceable as a matter of state law. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
The decision was based on the new interpretive approach announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:08 pm
Donna Nagy of the Indiana University's Maurer School of Law has been commenting on the Glom from time to time Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
There are a panoply of state-law [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:04 pm
Papesh v. [read post]
Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg – Florida Supreme Court Rejects Another Part of Workers’ Comp Law
29 Jun 2016, 1:37 pm
Additional Resources: Westphal v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:39 pm
(United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine whether Arizona's controversial immigration law [SB 1070 materials; JURIST news archive] is preempted by federal law. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm
The Court drew a basic tort law distinction between mental states regarding actions in the world and mental states regarding those actions’ implications in the law. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
S. __, 131 S.Ct. 1740, preempt state law rules invalidating mandatory arbitration provisions in a consumer contract as procedurally and substantively unconscionable? [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:26 pm
S. __, 131 S.Ct. 1740, preempt state law rules invalidating mandatory arbitration provisions in a consumer contract as procedurally and substantively unconscionable? [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 10:15 am
Iancu</i> appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:23 am
S. __, 131 S.Ct. 1740, preempt state law rules invalidating mandatory arbitration provisions in a consumer contract as procedurally and substantively unconscionable? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
The Court refers to its standard case law on freedom of expression and journalistic reporting in matters of public interest, and also observes that the present case bears a certain resemblance to the cases Fuentes Bobo v. [read post]
