Search for: "State v. Long" Results 6861 - 6880 of 45,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
The requirement to give sufficient reasons is long-standing, and is classically stated in Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573 (paragraph 43). [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:00 pm
While red states jockey with each other to see who can pass the strictest abortion law in the hope that theirs will be the one a future Supreme Court uses to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Federalism at the Border : "...My goal in this post is to provide a bit of a broader overview of what the Supreme Court has said about the relative roles and responsibilities of state and federal governments when it comes to immigration policy (and federal law enforcement, more generally)—with an eye toward explaining (1) the difference between states supplementing federal authority and states supplanting it; (2) why sanctuary cities are different; and (3) why… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:11 pm by Lee Tankle
Many of you may recall what happened the last time the Supreme Court found that the Board lacked a proper quorum, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
It was held that the previous judge was correct in stating that dishonesty could not properly be alleged by adding the knowledge of one innocent person to another (citing Armstrong v Strain [1952] 1 K.B 232 and Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch)). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:06 pm by Donna Bader
  It stated:                   “Long ago, this court discredited the custom of raising ‘‘arguable-but-unmeritorious’ issue[s]’ in Anders/Wende appeals; yet this practice persists. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 12:17 pm
This is the latest development in the long-running case of Rhino Sports v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
” Here is the Virginia AG’s statement: Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has decided not to join other states in an amicus brief on behalf of Albert Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]