Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 6861 - 6880 of 45,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
 The EPA and its federal partners intend to discuss the development of appropriate EM&V protocols for such measures with states in the coming years. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:16 am
On the other hand, in Estate of Cohen v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:21 am
With the economic recovery still tepid in Florida, many people are forgoing full auto insurance coverage - or sometimes giving it up altogether -because they can no longer afford it. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:36 am by by PritzkerLaw
It is particularly dangerous for young children, people with compromised immune systems and the elderly. [read post]