Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 6861 - 6880 of 29,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The response paper states that the duty of care will “only apply to companies that facilitate the sharing of user generated content, for example through comments, forums or video sharing”. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" RSSL §431, however, provides that "[i]n any retirement or pension plan to which the state or municipality thereof contributes, the salary base for the computation of retirement benefits shall in no event include … any additional compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Retirement and Social Security Law §431 [3]. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" RSSL §431, however, provides that "[i]n any retirement or pension plan to which the state or municipality thereof contributes, the salary base for the computation of retirement benefits shall in no event include … any additional compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Retirement and Social Security Law §431 [3]. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" RSSL §431, however, provides that "[i]n any retirement or pension plan to which the state or municipality thereof contributes, the salary base for the computation of retirement benefits shall in no event include … any additional compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Retirement and Social Security Law §431 [3]. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Its stated purpose is to benefit all persons, especially persons with disabilities, with a “Canada without barriers” in specified areas, including employment and the built environment. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
It is well known that overlooking is frequently a ground of objection to planning applications: any recognition that the cause of action in nuisance includes overlooking raises the prospect of claims in nuisance when such a planning objection has been rejected. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
It is well known that overlooking is frequently a ground of objection to planning applications: any recognition that the cause of action in nuisance includes overlooking raises the prospect of claims in nuisance when such a planning objection has been rejected. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:32 pm by Charlotte Butash, Benjamin Wittes
See Government’s Supplemental and Amended Sentencing Memorandum, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]