Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 2:31 pm
Flick After nine months of rumors and uncertainty as to where the FCC is headed after last summer's indecency decision by the Supreme Court in FCC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:38 pm
South Carolina, unanimously struck down a state law that banned registered sex offenders (RSOs) from using all Internet social media, holding that the law violated the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
You can read more about it here or click to register here.Around the weblogs. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 8:56 am
Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Consorzio subsequently took Balema to court for infringement of the PGI, with Balema arguing that it didn't infringe the PGI as it didn't use the entirety of it and the components to the name are not protected separately.The Court faced only a single question, which asked "...whether Article 1 of Regulation No 583/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that the protection of the name ‘Aceto Balsamico di Modena’ extends to the use of the individual non-geographical terms of… [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:49 am
ChaCha Search, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:43 am
Because space is limited, be sure to register for the free event (though voluntary donations support law student scholarships). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Spitsin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 2:34 am
This case illustrates the need for brand owners to have a zero-tolerance approach and be vigilant about trade mark misuse by others, to protect themselves with registered trade marks and use the courts to enforce where necessary. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:31 pm
Flick After nine months of rumors and uncertainty as to where the FCC is headed after last summer's indecency decision by the Supreme Court in FCC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:20 pm
Medimport, S.R.L. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:41 am
FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:19 am
Kaszuba d/b/a Hollywood Group v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Consorzio subsequently took Balema to court for infringement of the PGI, with Balema arguing that it didn't infringe the PGI as it didn't use the entirety of it and the components to the name are not protected separately.The Court faced only a single question, which asked "...whether Article 1 of Regulation No 583/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that the protection of the name ‘Aceto Balsamico di Modena’ extends to the use of the individual non-geographical terms of… [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:51 am
A third trustee, Joseph Masella, agreed to settle charges that he caused and willfully counseled the fund’s violations (SEC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:24 pm
The case is Craig Anthony Miller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:59 am
How far does the first sale or "exhaustion" principle extend in the United States? [read post]
