Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 42,068
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesE. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:48 pm
Recently in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
These and other petitions of the week are below: New Hampshire v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:08 pm
In one lawsuit, Dozier v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:07 pm
The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment (Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:39 pm
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
Now, in a petition filed this week, IJ is asking the Supreme Court to resolve the split. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 10:32 am
In a case with significant ramifications for employers concerned with protecting sensitive information, and for employees accused of abusing access to computer networks, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) heard oral argument this week in Van Buren v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:05 am
Shamren and others v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
” She was disciplined for the comment and (several weeks later) demoted from the division to her previous position. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:49 pm
This morning, the Court punted away Harvest Rock v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:03 pm
New Relists Azar v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:31 am
Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[UQ v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
For example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(f),***a Rule adopted by the New York State Civil Service Commission pursuant to the authority set out in Civil Service Law §63.2, provides that with respect to employees of the State as an employer, “the minimum and maximum periods of the probationary term of any employee shall be extended by the number of workdays of his [or her] absence which ... are not counted as time served in the probationary term. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
For example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(f),***a Rule adopted by the New York State Civil Service Commission pursuant to the authority set out in Civil Service Law §63.2, provides that with respect to employees of the State as an employer, “the minimum and maximum periods of the probationary term of any employee shall be extended by the number of workdays of his [or her] absence which ... are not counted as time served in the probationary term. [read post]
