Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
In Holt v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
While hands-free calls are obviously safer than holding a phone (which is illegal in many states), studies show that even talking on a hands free device is a distraction that can lead to a serious car accident. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:13 am
BPI Sports, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:42 am
Obesity Research Institute, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:14 pm
United States, an 1886 case that... [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, Information Law & Policy Centre. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
LEXIS 194 (MA App., Feb. 25, 2016), a Massachusetts state appeals court reversed a trial court's dismissal of a RLUIPA claim by a Nation of Islam inmate challenging limits on his access to use classroom space to pray and study throughout the week.In Hays v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/TOgl6KN7E0 -> CASL to inhibit communication and legitimate business https://t.co/TOgl6Kvwfq -> WIPO Internet Treaties Require No US Copyright Act Amendment to Protect Exclusive “Making Available” right https://t.co/UV61JsbNNF -> Link to US Copyright Office report on making available right https://t.co/oHplXqyFst -> Massive increase in UK cybercrime, survey finds https://t.co/JvAOAhs6KZ -> Court Beats Down Another Competitive Keyword Advertising… [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
To combat this growing problem, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), conducted research studies to uncover the most accurate tools for discovering and prosecuting potentially impaired drivers. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Not surprisingly, such dramatic change has itself yielded additional litigation possibilities: Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 11:20 am
” Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 11:20 am
” Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:25 am
The Court stated that the DOL was already conducting an investigation at the time of the 2011 report and that “a careful study of the documents [from the 2010 report] shows the numbers reconcile. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:11 pm
Kyazze, Walking the walk: Evidence of Principles in Action from Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies Phoebe Wynn-Pope, Yvette Zegenhagen & Fauve Kurnadi, Legislating against humanitarian principles: A case study on the humanitarian implications of Australian counterterrorism legislation Katrien Beeckman, From Fundamental Principles to individual action: Making the Principles come alive to promote a culture of non-violence and peace Ed Schenkenberg van Mierop, Coming clean… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
” Frankfurter’s dissents are today studied “if at all, only for their futility. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
