Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 6861 - 6880 of 55,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 9:24 pm by Rick Hasen
Jeremy Mallory has posted this draft on SSRN (Cal Western Law Review). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:28 am
 In other areas of the law involving police, we don't care about subjective motives. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am by Steve Gottlieb
Undermining people’s ability to take care of themselves and their families undermines the ways communities work, and we all pay the cost. [1] Chris Arnold, A New Trump Rule Could Weaken A Civil Rights Era Housing Discrimination Law, All Things Considered, July 31, 2019, 5:20 PM, available at https://www.npr.org/2019/07/31/747006108/a-new-trump-rule-could-weaken-a-civil-rights-era-housing-discrimination-law. [2] Washington v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
At bottom, both pieces seem to recognize that economic theories can help illuminate “what laws and rules are actually doing” (OI, v.1, p. 292) in order to enable better legal decisionmaking. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:43 pm
  According the Dictionary of Canadian Law, lineal consanguinity is defined as, “The relationship which exists between people descended from each other in a line, e.g. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:54 am by Dave Maass
Supporting the hotel owners, EFF argues that people must have the right to challenge surveillance laws like these on Fourth Amendment grounds, even before police have used the law to conduct a suspicionless search. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 12:04 am by David Smith
The post A new case on the licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation – Taylor v Mina An Ltd appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
” In March, the North Dakota Supreme Court blocked the state’s trigger abortion ban that went into effect after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:46 am by Jordan Gold
The Background of this CaseA trial judge convicted two people –  who were common law spouses – for sexually assaulting a 16 year-old on a camping trip. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:46 am by Robichaud
The Background of this CaseA trial judge convicted two people –  who were common law spouses – for sexually assaulting a 16 year-old on a camping trip. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
In addition, case law ( JD v East Berkshire and Jain v Trent SHA [2007] EWCA Civ 1186 cited) indicates a ‘greater willingness to find the existence of duties of care subsequent to the passing of the Human Rights Act 2000. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 5:38 am by James Romoser
Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:43 am
Here's a message from the National Women's Law Center, with information about what people can do besides fume about Ledbetter and pray that the Fair Pay Restoration Act gets passed. [read post]