Search for: "True the Vote"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 11,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 8:51 am
This is probably even more true in the election setting, when the partisan stakes are so high. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:06 pm
The DoJ document controversy and the sometimes-testy Brennan confirmation process and delayed vote show, however, that members of Congress can exact political costs on executive branch intelligence programs, even if they have little chance or interest in formally legislating. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:51 pm
How could that be true, when Congress made clear that it considered Section 5 a temporary, emergency provision that would terminate after five years? [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:37 am
True, the Canadian vote model is far preferable to the ridiculous, months long campaigns permitted under the American NLRA. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:37 am
True, the Canadian vote model is far preferable to the ridiculous, months long campaigns permitted under the American NLRA. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
Even when the federal government told us we had no right to exist, we stayed true to ourselves. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
” It is true that state constitutions may permit state legislatures to do things that Congress cannot, but if the question is—as Professor Jackson rightly says it is—whether a legislature has any distinct interest that it is allowed to vindicate in federal court, Karcher does make it harder, though perhaps not impossible, for the Court to draw the first distinction that Professor Jackson offers. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
It’s true that Congress was mostly focused on the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment as authority for the most recent reauthorization. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:05 pm
Then, facing intense public criticism, the professors refused to provide a rationale for their vote. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
“That assertion is simply not true. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:24 am
That is, if title were held by France in retrocession, Napoleon could not sell it to a third party; if it were held by Spain, he could not sell it at all and yet Jefferson agreed to the deal understanding that one of those two scenarios was true. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 3:36 pm
You'd want to vote not guilty. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 1:39 pm
True or False? [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
Though he’s left it to Congress to work out the details, the president said the White House has already written its own that he’ll send for an up or down vote if lawmakers are too slow. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Women did not even have the right to vote, after all. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 2:50 pm
No doubt, the House can pass any law actually passed by the Senate if Boehner behaves as a true Speaker of the House instead of the leader of the Republican caucus and therefore schedules a vote on a bill that might pass with the support of say, 100% of the Democrats and 20% of the Republicans. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
True settlement is elusive. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
Asked, for example, if he would vote for defense cuts if they cost jobs in Massachusetts, he called for “a balanced approach,” with some cuts and some revenue growth. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
But both the movement and the party will change, and all of this will occur without the need for a constitutional amendment.It is true that some campaign finance measures (and some blanket primaries) are blocked by current Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:25 pm
They are both "Protestant"; it is just that the remnant group conceives itself as better described without that adjective (perhaps because the parent Church also voted in 1976 to drop the word from its name).But then a true confusion results: since the remnant group sees themselves as "the Episcopal Church in South Carolina", and are indifferent to using the adjective "Protestant", they could not distinguish themselves from a group which called itself "the Episcopal Diocese of… [read post]
